- Should state approve wolf-control measures on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula?
- Predator control decision delayed
- Does science back up Alaska's policy of killing grizzly bears?
- ACTION ALERT: Sign the Petition and Say NO to Brown & Black Bear Baiting & Snaring in Alaska
- Citizens Need to Act to Base State Predator Control More on Science
- The Cora and Corey Show
- Surprise! Good News from the Alaska Board of Game!
- Victory for Unimak Wolves!
- Alaska Politicians, Lawyers Fight Rages on Against Federal Authority
- ACTION ALERT: Help Save the Wolves of Unimak Island
| Feds Right to Study Unimak Herd |
|
|
|
|
Letters / Anchorage Daily News / June 16, 2010 Alaskans enjoy painting the "feds" wrong. Unfortunately The Associated Press in Alaska supported that attitude in reporting Unimak Island's decline in caribou numbers, the state's proposal to kill the island's wolves, and the "feds" blocking the plan. The AP story was picked up in Alaska and nationwide. Yet the proposal to kill island wolves lacked basis. Wolf numbers are guessed at 30. Caribou and bears number around 400 each. One could assume the state targeted wolves, because it is saving bear predators for lucrative trophy hunting. Over-hunting is one reason the caribou herd declined. Prime bulls culled by hunting resulted in numbers insufficient to serve the cows. Volcanic effects on grazing and other issues impact the herd. Federal biologists are right in completing a mandated study to learn reasons for the herd's decline. Allowing reactive wolf killing from planes on a U.S. Wildlife preserve would be a disservice to Americans and terrible precedent. Alaska newspapers and TV used one-sided information provided by Alaska DF&G. -- Patricia OBrien / Juneau |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





