- Should state approve wolf-control measures on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula?
- Predator control decision delayed
- Does science back up Alaska's policy of killing grizzly bears?
- ACTION ALERT: Sign the Petition and Say NO to Brown & Black Bear Baiting & Snaring in Alaska
- Citizens Need to Act to Base State Predator Control More on Science
- The Cora and Corey Show
- Surprise! Good News from the Alaska Board of Game!
- Victory for Unimak Wolves!
- Alaska Politicians, Lawyers Fight Rages on Against Federal Authority
- ACTION ALERT: Help Save the Wolves of Unimak Island
| Victory for Unimak Wolves! |
|
|
|
Included in the FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) statement issued by Geoffrey Haskett of the USFWS were several allusions to the 95,000 comments received regarding the issue, most of which favored "No Action." This was YOUR effort felt all the way back in Washington, DC! Additionally, the report noted the only comment received from a resident of the island was also in favor of “No Action.” Citing other possible factors such as poor forage, poor forage nutrition, weather, overhunting by humans, and predation, the report could find no supporting data to focus on wolves in such a lethal manner. Instead, it noted as a national refuge it should be managed naturally with as little human impact or intervention as possible. Below you will find links to the FONSI document, an article which appeared recently in the Anchorage Daily News noting how well the Porcupine Caribou Herd is rebounding without any aerial hunting involved, and also a link to Geoffrey Haskett of the USFWS should you wish to send a quick note of thanks for his decision.
As much as this is a victory for the refuge system and Alaskan wildlife in general, it is also YOUR victory. Enjoy it fully! Thanks and congratulations. Your comments and petitions made the difference. Tina M. Brown, President, AWA Alaska
Wildlife Alliance |
|||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|







